U.S.Crusade | RaceandHistory | RastaTimes | HowComYouCom | News Links | Trini Soca | Africa Speaks
Trinicenter.com Trinicenter.com Trinidad and Tobago News
Online Forums
Create an AccountHome | Account | World News  

International Watch
  • Home
  • AvantGo
  • Feedback
  • Search
  • Stories Archive
  • Submit News

  • Categories
  • Africa Focus
  • Arab Spring
  • Audio & Video
  • Book Review
  • Caribbean
  • Inside U.S.A.
  • Invasion of Iraq
  • Israel-Palestine
  • Latin America
  • Medical
  • Pakistan
  • Pandora's Box
  • Racism Watch
  • Satire
  • US War on Iran
  • War and Terror
  • War on Russia
  • War on Syria
  • World Focus
  • Zimbabwe

  • Old Articles
    Saturday, January 07
    · Media Hype Fake News Report Claiming Russian US Election Hacking
    Friday, December 02
    · What can go wrong?
    · Cuba, Fidel, Socialism … Hasta la victoria siempre!
    Sunday, November 13
    · George Soros Financed Anti-Trump Protests
    · Clinton Is the Most Dangerous Person Alive
    Sunday, October 09
    · Always remember
    Tuesday, September 27
    · He Who Hesitates Is Lost And Russia Hesitated
    Thursday, August 18
    · US Impunity under threat: Turkey may disintegrate NATO
    Monday, July 11
    · Made Man in a Blue Vest: Deray McKesson
    Saturday, June 25
    · Why the British said no to Europe
    Saturday, June 18
    · U.S. Sets Stage for Libya-Like Regime Change in Eritrea, “Africa’s Cuba”
    Monday, June 06
    · Muhammad Ali: My Name, Not Yours
    Friday, June 03
    · There Has Been A Coup In Brazil
    Saturday, May 28
    · Silencing America as It Prepares for War
    Friday, May 27
    · The Looting Stage of Capitalism: Germany’s Assault on the IMF
    Wednesday, May 25
    · Get Real: Petrodollars, not corruption is the reason for Brazilian coup
    · Russia Denounces External Forces for Crisis in Venezuela
    Tuesday, May 24
    · Call It a 'Coup': How Elite Orchestrated Overthrow in Brazil
    Thursday, May 19
    · Hillary Clinton’s Race Problem
    · Roots of the Conflict: Palestine’s Nakba in the Larger Arab ‘Catastrophe’

    Older Articles

    Features

    Sudan''s Crisis

    Zimbabwe: Land Reform and Mugabe

    U.S Coup in Haiti

    Venezuela and Chavez


      
    Invasion of Iraq: Building Democracy in Iraq and Other Absurdities
    Posted on Friday, May 14 @ 18:24:07 UTC
    Topic: Bushwacked
    BushwackedWatch the Left Line Up Behind the Imperial Agenda

    By Stephen Gowans,

    Who believes the following?

    Foreign troops should leave Iraq immediately.

    The US occupation authority, and the Iraqi Governing Council, should be disbanded just as quickly.

    An interim government should be appointed, not by the UN, not by the US, not by the occupation authority, and not by the Iraqi Governing Council, but by Iraqis themselves.

    Elections should follow, to be organized, run and supervised by Iraqis, not the UN, and definitely not the US.

    The rebellion led by Moqtada Sadr against occupation forces is justifiable and worthy of support.

    Answer: A majority of Iraqis, according to a recent poll conducted for the US occupation authority [1].

    What's the chance Washington will listen?

    Answer: Absolutely none.

    Why not?

    Answer: Because quitting the country, and leaving Iraqis to run the place themselves, would interfere with the US project of...building democracy in Iraq.

    Absurd? So what else is new?

    According to the poll:
    Over 80 percent of Iraqis want foreign militaries out of their country.

    Eight of 10 have no confidence in the Coalition Provisional Authority.

    More than four of five say that Iraqis alone should supervise the 2005 elections.

    Two-thirds in Basra support the insurgency.
    And less than one-tenth of one percent say the Iraqi Governing Council should appoint the interim government -- a whole lot higher than the number who think the US should, which is none.

    To make matters worse, the poll was taken before photos of cocky US guards striking thumbs up poses as they humiliated Iraqi prisoners dribbled out of the notorious Abu Ghraib prison. One can only imagine how much more dead set Iraqis are now against a continued US presence.

    To say the US occupation has no legitimacy in the eyes of Iraqis is to say too little. Think of the Nazis occupying France.

    Too harsh?

    Most Americans will say so.

    Oh sure, some will admit that under the Bush administration the US has hardly followed Dale Carnegie's advice on winning friends and influencing people, but this is an anomaly, surely.

    Well, yes and no. The Democrats foreign policy would stick closely to Carnegie's text, while still screwing over other people with as much zeal as the Bush administration has. The difference would be skin deep, which, in the run-up to Election '04, has become all the difference in the world, according to those who loathe Bush with a fury and are looking for a peg to hang a vote for Kerry on.

    Not that Bush isn't loathsome. When he settled into Washington I had a good deal of fun ridiculing his pack of velociraptors as they set out to "shape the international security situation in line with US interests and objectives." It was cathartic.

    But I soon realized that calling the Bush cabinet a pack of velociraptors, as vicious as its members are, was a mistake. It made it seem that it was the attributes of the people in power that made US foreign policy warlike and expansionist.

    If you believed this, the solution was clear: Get rid of the velociraptors, and you get rid of a bloody, vicious, imperialist foreign policy.

    But US foreign policy has always been this way, no matter who was in charge, velociraptors or pacific apatosauruses. And it has never been particularly concerned with the opinions -- or fate -- of the foreign. ers who've been its victims. Iraqis are simply the last in a long line.

    Starting from the Revolutionary War, the US has engaged in warlike activity somewhere in the world in three of every four years of its existence [2]. And the prizes, for that part of the population that owns and controls the economy, have been rich indeed: land, mines, plantations, oil and energy rights, export markets, low-wage labor, and military bases -- hundreds of them in scores of countries, outposts to guarantee that more and more of the world is open to US exports and investment, whether the indigenous population likes it or not.

    And how many aggressions has the US been involved in since 1999, a mere half-decade? Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Iraq again.

    US militarism hardly looks like a policy of a group of people in power. It looks more like something that is built in -- systemic and hoary and bound to carry on in the usual fashion no matter whose name plate sits on the desk in the Oval Office.

    Which says that getting rid of the group now in power, and replacing it with another group -- as has been done time and time again in US history -- isn't going to change what makes the US go to war, or outrage the sovereignty of others.

    That's all the more true, given that the presumptive Democrat contender to the White House, John Kerry, looks more like Bush on steroids than Bush-lite when it comes to foreign policy questions.

    Kerry says his military will be bigger than Bush's [3], and that he too will use force preventively and unilaterally [4].

    And recently he pledged that, unlike Bush, he'd get the job done in Cuba [5]. Castro, and all his intolerable baggage -- full-employment, free health care, and free education -- would be swept away, to be replaced by the phony freedom and democracy Iraqis are so grateful the US is ramming down their throats.

    Sadly, the Left will line up behind this right-wing, pro-imperialist anyway -- stupidly, desperately, unsure what do to, but to toss the dice once again, in a fixed game.

    And if that's not as absurd as the US staying in Iraq over the objections of a vast majority of Iraqis, for democracy, what is?

    Stephen Gowans is a writer and political activist who lives in Ottawa, Canada. He can be reached at: sr.gowans@sympatico.ca

    1. "80% in Iraq Distrust Occupation Authority," The Washington Post, May 13, 2004.

    2. Harry Magdoff, "Imperialism Without Colonies," Monthly Review Press, New York, 2003. p. 115.

    3. "On foreign policy, Kerry is not far from Bush," The Globe and Mail, March 3, 2004.

    4. "Kerry Condemns Bush for Failing to Back Aristide," The New York Times, March 7, 2004; John Laughland, "If it's war you want, vote Kerry," The Spectator, April 10, 2004.

    5. "Bush's Failed Policies on Cuba," www.johnkerry.com, May 7, 2004


    Reproduced from: www.counterpunch.org

     
    Related Links
    · 9/11 Attack and Aftermath
    · More about Bushwacked
    · News by ZeberuS


    Most read story about Bushwacked:
    Rumsfeld Dumped, Bush Suggests a Spook


    Article Rating
    Average Score: 0
    Votes: 0

    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Excellent
    Very Good
    Good
    Regular
    Bad


    Options

     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly



    Homepage | Trinidad News | Africa Speaks | U.S.Crusade | Fair Use Notice


    Copyright © 2002-2014 Trinicenter.com
    Trinicenter.com is a 100% non-profit Website
    You can syndicate our news using the file backend.php or ultramode.txt
    All logos, trademarks, articles and comments are property of their respective owners.
    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2004 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL.
    PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.
    Page Generation: 0.38 Seconds