Trinicenter.com Trinicenter.com Trinidad and Tobago News
Online Forums
  Welcome, Guest. Please Login
Trinicenter.com International Forum
  HomeHelpSearchLogin  
 
Gandhi branded racist in Johannesburg (Read 13694 times)
Ayinde
Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 85
Gandhi branded racist in Johannesburg
Oct 17th, 2003 at 9:38pm
 
Gandhi branded racist as Johannesburg honours freedom fighter

Rory Carroll in Johannesburg
Friday October 17, 2003
The Guardian


It was supposed to honour his resistance to racism in South Africa, but a new statue of Mahatma Gandhi in Johannesburg has triggered a row over his alleged contempt for black people.

The 2.5 metre high (8ft) bronze statue depicting Gandhi as a dashing young human rights lawyer has been welcomed by Nelson Mandela, among others, for recognising the Indian who launched the fight against white minority rule at the turn of the last century.

But critics have attacked the gesture for overlooking racist statements attributed to Gandhi, which suggest he viewed black people as lazy savages who were barely human.

Newspapers continue to publish letters from indignant readers: "Gandhi had no love for Africans. To [him], Africans were no better than the 'Untouchables' of India," said a correspondent to The Citizen.

Others are harsher, claiming the civil rights icon "hated" black people and ignored their suffering at the hands of colonial masters while championing the cause of Indians.

Unveiled this month, the statue stands in Gandhi Square in central Johannesburg, not far from the office from which he worked during some of his 21 years in South Africa.

The British-trained barrister was supposed to have been on a brief visit in 1893 to represent an Indian company in a legal action, but he stayed to fight racist laws after a conductor kicked him off a train for sitting in a first-class compartment reserved for whites.

Outraged, he started defending Indians charged with failing to register for passes and other political offences, founded a newspaper, and formed South Africa's first organised political resistance movement. His tactics of mobilising people for passive resistance and mass protest inspired black people to organise and some historians credit Gandhi as the progenitor of the African National Congress, which formed in 1912, two years before he returned to India to fight British colonial rule.

However, the new statue has prompted bitter recollections about some of Gandhi's writings.

Forced to share a cell with black people, he wrote: "Many of the native prisoners are only one degree removed from the animal and often created rows and fought among themselves."

He was quoted at a meeting in Bombay in 1896 saying that Europeans sought to degrade Indians to the level of the "raw kaffir, whose occupation is hunting and whose sole ambition is to collect a certain number of cattle to buy a wife with, and then pass his life in indolence and nakedness".

The Johannesburg daily This Day said GB Singh, the author of a critical book about Gandhi, had sifted through photos of Gandhi in South Africa and found not one black person in his vicinity.

The Indian embassy in Pretoria declined to comment, as it prepared for President Thabo Mbeki's visit to India.

Khulekani Ntshangase, a spokesman for the ANC Youth League, defended Gandhi, saying the critics missed the bigger picture of his immense contribution to the liberation struggle.

Gandhi's offending comments were made early in his life when he was influenced by Indians working on the sugar plantations and did not get on with the black people of modern-day KwaZulu-Natal province, said Mr Ntshangase.

"Later he got more enlightened."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/southafrica/story/0,13262,1065018,00.html
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Tyehimba
Newbies
*
Offline


Trinicenter.com

Posts: 16
Trinidad
Gender: male
Re: Gandhi branded racist in Johannesburg
Reply #1 - Oct 24th, 2003 at 12:52am
 
Putting Gandhi in perspective

Many things can be realized from this reasoning on Gandhi.

One should not leave one's education in the hands of fools. It is imperative that people take responsibility for informing themselves and not just accept what is given to us. There are peublic personalaties who we have had crammed down our throat through the mechanisms of media and the educational systerm, and told, here are your heroes, here is your villians. Unless people search outside the mainstream media for information and support alternative mediums of media they will continue to be slaves to ignorance. There are persons who have been labeled great leaders and we we have been almost implored to follow totally and blindly. Such persons while they may have fulfilled certian roles, may not have been radical and informed enough to do anything but rock the boat of White Supremacy a little bit. So as a such they were not considered big threats.

The issue with Gandhi is not so much that he was a racist and only opposed the white power structure because he was on the recieving end of it, but that people want to follow him blindly and rate him as an exceptional leader while being ignorant of (or deliberately ignoring) his blatant demeaning attitude towards Africans and lower class Indians (especially the dark Dalit people of India).

Another leader who is often lumped with Ghandi when the mainstream wants examples of  'great non-white leaders' is Martin Luther King. While i do not doubt his contribution to the civil rights movement, i think he underestimated the deviousness of white supremacy and in his ignorance, pacified the rage of the people to the benefit of the shivering white power structure. He thought that since when the adults marched they would get brutalized, Black children would march instead, but it was the same reaction: dogs, batons and water hoses. It was pointed out to me recently that there is a certain courage that is required to stand up physically for yourself when you are being pysically abused, and unless the process of standing up for oneself is realized then a blanket philosophy of non-violence can be quite cowardly.

It is the lessons that can be learned from history that needs to be emphasize. And this can only be best done when multiple perspectives are presented and people are properly informed. Is not so much a matter of criticizing Gandhi but presentiing the truth so people can better understand themselves and those around them. It is important to realize that everyone has their role to play, even the most ignorant.

Tyehimba Salandy

For more on Gandhi: http://www.howcomyoucom.com/articles/nov282000.htm
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged