Trinicenter.com - Did Aryans invade India from the North?

by Pianke Nubiyang

Here are the facts:

1. The term "Aryan" has nothing to do with race, it is a linguistic term and it used to apply to all the people who were composed of a number of groups who lived in the Eurasian region. They were nomads similar to the Scythians, Cimmerians and others.

2. All European languages except Finnish and Sami, Basque and others are related to the Indo-Aryan languages. That clearly shows that many of the peoples who live in Northern India and who trickled in various parts of the land came from somewhere else.

3. The Aboriginal and native languages of India including Tamil, Kannada, Malayalam, Gond, Kinerese and others are related to the Kushitic language family that is spread from Somalia in East Africa to Senegal in West Africa. This language group is part of the super-language called the Mende group. The Afro-Asiatic languages such as Kushitic, Ancient Egyptian, pre-Aryan East Indian, and others are part of this family; that is why they are called "Afro-Asiatic".

Both Hebrew and Arabic are Afro-Asiatic languages and according to some linguists, Hebrew and Arabic are actually dialects of Ancient Egyptian. In fact the oldest form of the Semitic language found today...The "mother tongue" is still spoken in Kenya. It is called "Iraqwu." The question of the Aryan invasions of India and their subjection of the Black Australoid peoples is a fact and it is a fact that manifests itself today in the continuation of the Caste System of India, the first form of sanctified racism invented, according to Indian sources (see "The Black Untouchables of India," by V.T. Rajshekar)

As far as the Aryan-speakers are concerned, they were not Black Dravidians or the Negroid-Australoid groups that live in Southern and Eastern India today. The Aryans are related to people who live in Iran and Europe. In fact, the languages of Hindi, Gujarati and others are part of the Indo-European family of languages. The people are also genetically related to Caucasian peoples. On the other hand, the negro-Australoid peoples are genetically and physically related to Africans (see more on the genetic tests done recently dalitstan.org )

There should not be any controversy of the origins of the Aryans. Many were very fair, blonde-haired, blue-eyed people. This is not a physical type conducive to living in a hot, humid environment or an icy, cold, windy, harsh environment. The Aryans had to have originated in a very damp, cold and wet environment in order to have developed the type of racial characteristics hey have.

Africans in the very hot regions of Africa are usually tall and very dark. Eskimos living in the very cold regions of Alaska and the far North are darker than Britons and other Western Europeans. The South of India and most likely the tropical regions of Middle and Western India with its deserts, hot sun and dry environment is the type of environment where Negroid peoples develop. Hence, the Aryans could not have come from India, and if they did not invade outright, why is there evidence that there has been centuries of war in India against northern peoples, ranging from the Aryans and Scythians to the Greeks
(Descendants of Greeks still live in Northern Pakistan).

So, this idea that barbarians, no matter what their title did not invade India and contributed to the destruction of what was a great Black civilization is not the reality. As far as the Greeks and others were concerned, the Indians of South India resembled Africans in every way except for hair texture (a condition that evolved in the very hot, humid regions of East Africa in ancient times). Hence the Greeks called Black Dravidian language speakers (Dravidian is a linguistic term dealing with language, and the British colonialists popularized it) and Negro-Australoid race "Eastern Ethiopians." (Australoid is also a British term meaning "Southern Negroes or Southern Blacks" See how some Indians feel about the Aryan question; Go to dalitstan.org

Also see "History of Racism," http://community.webtv.net/paulnubiaempire, Check out the references particularly by M. Gopinath of Bangalore, India who is part of the Dalit Academy take any book dealing with the language called "Hindi" and compare it with any European language, and the similarities will be seen. Take the languages spoken in Southern India, Melanesia, Japan and Australia and compare them to the languages of East Africa, especially Southern Ethiopia, Sudan, Kenya and Tanzania and you will be utterly shocked to see the similarities.